Law Information
Law Information
In this post, Anna Walsh (Partner) and Nicole Ellerby (Associate) in CMS’ medical malpractice team considered the awaited decision from the Supreme Court in the Scottish case of McCulloch and Ors v Forth Valley Health Board [2021] CSHI 21.
Overview
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax Disputes & Investigations team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd [2023] UKSC 17, which was handed down on 17 May 2023. The
This appeal concerns the tort of private nuisance (a civil wrong) in the context of a major oil spill. The question at issue is whether there is a continuing private nuisance and hence a continuing cause of action. This is
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or logged in to Mondaq.com.
Our Associate, Fatima Alsayed expands on changes to regulations of pensions and retirement allowances for government employees.
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. The appeal was heard by
IN BRIEF
the Public Health (Further Extension of Declared Public Health Emergency—COVID-19) Regulation (No. 2) 2022 was implemented only last week. However, the Premier has turned around on that announcement and has announced some of Queensland’s last remaining COVID-19 restrictions
![Candey Ltd v Crumpler and one other (as Joint Liquidators of Peak Motels and Resorts Ltd (In Liquidation)) [2022] UKSC 35 – UKSC Weblog](https://i2.wp.com/i.ibb.co/NVhD53S/bertemu-dengan-mitra-bisnis-legal-potret-stok-yy.jpg?w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1 "Candey Ltd v Crumpler and one other (as Joint Liquidators of Peak Motels and Resorts Ltd (In Liquidation)) [2022] UKSC 35 – UKSC Weblog")
Candey Ltd, the appellant, acted as a solicitor for Peak Motels & Resorts Ltd (“PHRL”) between April 2014 and March 2016 in respect of worldwide litigation and numerous different issues. One such matter was an motion within the Excessive Court