law firm names

100 Industry Organizations Request Extension of Comment Period on FTC’s Proposed Noncompete Ban

As we predicted, earlier today, 100 industry organizations submitted a request to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to extend the comment period for its proposed rule banning non-competes nationwide by an additional 60 days. According to the letter, “[t]he regulated …

INVESTIGATION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces it is Investigating Claims Against ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact

INVESTIGATION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces it is Investigating Claims Against ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announced that it is investigating

ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages ESS Tech Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action Filed by the Firm – GWH

New York, New York–(Newsfile Corp. – February 2, 2023) – WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of ESS Tech Inc. GWH between August 11, 2022 and December 7, 2022, both dates

TCBI SHAREHOLDER ALERT: ROSEN, A HIGHLY RECOGNIZED LAW FIRM, Encourages Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action

Published: Jan. 23, 2023 at 5:15 PM EST|Updated: 7 hours ago

NEW YORK, Jan. 23, 2023 /PRNewswire/ —

Rosen Law Firm, PA Logo
Rosen Law Firm, PA Logo(PRNewswire)

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues

ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages NewAge Inc. Investors with Losses to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in First Filed Securities Class Action

NEW YORK, Jan. 6, 2023 /PRNewswire/ —

Rosen Law Firm, PA Logo

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of NewAge, Inc. (NASDAQ: NBEV) (OTC: NBEVQ) between January 18, 2018 and October 18, 2022both dates

Pinkerton Tobacco v. Kretek Int’l: Defendant’s Statute of Limitations Argument Goes Up in Smoke

A Central District of California court docket just lately denied a defendant’s movement for abstract judgment the place the defendant argued that the plaintiff’s claims for commerce secret misappropriation had been barred by the relevant statute of limitations. The court